<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analyzing Web Traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adrian3.com/2009/11/analyzing-web-traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adrian3.com/2009/11/analyzing-web-traffic/</link>
	<description>the blog of Adrian Hanft, III</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:12:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trace</title>
		<link>http://adrian3.com/2009/11/analyzing-web-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Trace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrian3.com/?p=571#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing; this is inspiring. Not because I&#039;m after a lot of web traffic, but because I&#039;m on the verge of updating my own website, whose content and design seems (to me) to have grown a little stale. The prospect of a redo always reopens the question of site &quot;identity.&quot; What do I want this site to be? A blog? A business offering creative services? An art portfolio? A design portfolio? A place where I can rant about shoddy products and services that I&#039;ve bought? A work of web art in and of itself? Each of these options might necessitate a different authorial &quot;voice.&quot; But which one is my most natural voice? You seem to be advocating using one&#039;s own voice, and trusting that if one has enough to say, an audience will follow. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing; this is inspiring. Not because I&#8217;m after a lot of web traffic, but because I&#8217;m on the verge of updating my own website, whose content and design seems (to me) to have grown a little stale. The prospect of a redo always reopens the question of site &#8220;identity.&#8221; What do I want this site to be? A blog? A business offering creative services? An art portfolio? A design portfolio? A place where I can rant about shoddy products and services that I&#8217;ve bought? A work of web art in and of itself? Each of these options might necessitate a different authorial &#8220;voice.&#8221; But which one is my most natural voice? You seem to be advocating using one&#8217;s own voice, and trusting that if one has enough to say, an audience will follow. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
