New Walmart Logo
Monday, June 30th, 2008Did you hear that Wal-Mart has a new logo? Here are the bullet points:
1. The name is no longer Wal-Mart. It is Walmart. At least they didn’t change it to Wally World, am I right?
2. Apparently the logo will be complimented by a burnt orange color. Nobody knows for sure how burnt orange is actually going to compliment light blue and yellow, but that’s beside the point.
3. The star separating “Wal” from “Mart” is gone and so is the blue and white. Patriotic colors are so yesterday.
4. No word on whether or not the yellow smiley face guy is gone for good or not. Cross your fingers.
5. To the right of the logo is a yellow starburst or sun or asterisk or something.
Here is a short video clip showing the logo from Fox News:
[Ok, I just can't let that last comment from the reporter pass. He says "How much does that job pay do you think? Coming up with a little sunshine?" Seriously? What an idiot! How much do you think that jerk makes to wear a suit all day and read other people's words? Moron. Moving on...]
My first reaction to the logo was, I have to admit, a little perverted. My problem is that ever since reading “Breakfast of Champions” by Kurt Vonnegut I have never looked at asterisks the same way. Google it if you don’t know what I am talking about.
I will leave it to the other blogs to dissect the logo more. Criticize the font. Question the color. Scream about the symbol. The usual. I guess my post is more about the positioning. Is this a step towards positioning the company as a more trendy or up-scale store? In other words a reaction to the success that Target is enjoying. Or is it an attempt at a facelift to appease the communities that object to the presence of the giant stores? That is too much weight to put on even a great logo, so they will have to have some incredibly amazing supporting design elements if they are going to pull that off.
If they can’t change their brand image with this new logo then what’s the point of a redesign? As bad as the old logo was (if you can call it a logo), at least it was honest. It was a generic warehouse sign. No frills. It made you think that the money they saved by not having a logo or nice signage was being passed right along to the customer. It may be design blasphemy, but I think there was some merit to that “lack of design” philosophy. It will be really interesting to see how the new identity works out for them.



